C. Scott Brown / Android Authority
Samsung is the most well-liked Android smartphone maker globally, however my largest downside with the corporate is that its flagship telephones obtain few {hardware} upgrades in comparison with rivals. Don’t consider me? The Galaxy S25 and S25 Plus have new processors, however provide the identical charging and digicam specs because the Galaxy S22 and S22 Plus. Even the Galaxy S25 Extremely merely presents a brand new processor, ultrawide digicam, and Gorilla Glass, however sticks with the identical battery and charging tech as its predecessors.
This may be irritating for Samsung followers and normal smartphone customers, particularly as producers like Xiaomi, OPPO, vivo, and OnePlus routinely provide thrilling upgrades. However with all of this in thoughts, we are able to suppose of some the explanation why Samsung seldom presents large upgrades for its telephones.
Why do you suppose Samsung would not provide large upgrades fairly often?
984 votes
1. Manufacturing challenges

C. Scott Brown / Android Authority
Samsung ships extra smartphones than some other Android OEM, and its flagship telephones often seem in listings of the highest ten best-selling smartphones. This creates an attention-grabbing problem, because it wants an enormous provide of components from companions to truly construct all of these telephones.
This problem means Samsung can’t undertake a cutting-edge half in a telephone if its suppliers can solely produce a small variety of them. Subsequently, the Galaxy maker is likely to be compelled to depend on tried-and-tested components that suppliers can readily produce in large numbers. This might be why we don’t see {hardware} upgrades like one-inch digicam sensors, variable telephoto digicam modules, and extra.
2. Reliability or security issues

Ryan Haines / Android Authority
One more reason why Samsung would possibly maintain off on main upgrades is that it’s nervous about security or long-term reliability. You solely want to have a look at 2016’s Galaxy Observe 7 for proof of what can go fallacious, as faulty batteries resulted within the telephones catching hearth. Airways even banned the telephone from their planes.
This saga is probably going why Samsung nonetheless performs it secure relating to battery upgrades, because it makes use of the identical battery capability throughout a number of telephone generations. In actual fact, the Galaxy S25 Extremely has the identical 5,000mAh battery because the Galaxy S21 Extremely. In the meantime, the bottom Galaxy S mannequin has solely seen modest upgrades over time, going from the S22’s 3,700mAh battery to the S25’s 4,000mAh pack.
In contrast, rival Chinese language producers usually use silicon-carbon batteries of their telephones, enabling extra juice for a similar bodily measurement or the identical capability at a smaller bodily measurement. For instance, the OnePlus 15 has a 7,300mAh battery whereas the OPPO Discover X9 Professional has a 7,500mAh battery. These batteries are likely to degrade quicker than Samsung’s lithium-ion batteries, however they’re similar to, or higher than, Apple and Google’s conventional batteries.
3. Revenue margin issues

Robert Triggs / Android Authority
This is likely to be the primary purpose why Samsung usually doesn’t provide large upgrades for its telephones. Newer components merely price greater than older components, so Samsung possible sticks with older, cheaper parts purely as a result of it nonetheless must make a wholesome revenue. That’s not a shock, as the corporate is a enterprise in spite of everything.
Nevertheless, it’s exhausting to argue that Samsung hasn’t taken profit-chasing to new extremes in the previous few years. For instance, rival producers provide flagship telephones with 3x 50MP periscope cameras, however the Galaxy S25 and S25 Plus keep on with an ageing 3x 10MP digicam.
This concentrate on revenue additionally manifests in one other manner, as Samsung’s base Galaxy S mannequin lacks Extremely options like 45W wired charging and Gorilla Armor safety. That is possible for product differentiation functions, as persons are compelled to purchase the dearer Extremely mannequin in the event that they actually need these perks. The agency additionally skips telephoto cameras on its Galaxy A telephones, ostensibly so customers should pay somewhat additional for the Galaxy S fashions.
Business watchers like leaker Ice Universe lay the blame on the toes of cellular chief TM Roh. That is comprehensible, as Samsung’s Galaxy S telephones began to stagnate after he assumed the place. Nevertheless, Roh’s tenure additionally coincided with Covid, whereas the trade has additionally endured part worth will increase in the previous few years. However regardless of the underlying trigger, revenue concerns are undoubtedly a giant purpose why we don’t see main upgrades fairly often.
4. An absence of competitors

One understated purpose Samsung won’t provide large upgrades for its telephones fairly often is that it doesn’t have a lot direct competitors on this area. In actual fact, colleague Megan Ellis rightfully identified that Samsung doesn’t have to fret about HUAWEI anymore owing to US sanctions.
Individuals neglect that HUAWEI was making up main floor on Samsung up till 2020, and it even handed Apple for the quantity two spot globally. Gadgets just like the P20 Professional and P20 Lite have been large sellers within the agency’s strongholds of Europe, the Center East, and Africa. Moreover, the corporate additionally popularized AI chips and periscope cameras. I’d strongly argue that HUAWEI stored Samsung on its toes and compelled it to undertake new applied sciences and massive upgrades sooner.
Samsung not has stiff Android competitors within the US, both. Motorola, OnePlus, and TCL are the one Chinese language producers within the nation, however one of the best OnePlus telephones aren’t obtainable through carriers, TCL doesn’t provide actually high-end telephones, and Motorola isn’t a constant flagship participant within the area. So Samsung would possibly suppose it doesn’t must spend cash on large upgrades when its largest market doesn’t have a lot alternative within the first place. It’s a far cry from the remainder of the world, the place OPPO, vivo, Xiaomi, and different Chinese language telephones are available.
5. Inside obligations

Samsung isn’t only a telephone maker. It additionally makes many components that go into telephones within the first place. This consists of processors, RAM, storage, the show, and digicam sensors.
Samsung is likely to be obligated to make use of internally sourced parts in lieu of components from different manufacturers. The corporate tends to make use of in-house shows for its high-end telephones, quite than probably cheaper or higher screens from Chinese language firm BOE. The agency additionally sticks with the identical ageing Samsung ISOCELL digicam sensors, regardless of the supply of extra superior sensors each in-house and through different suppliers.
One outstanding instance of those inner obligations is the in-house Exynos processors, that are apparently cheaper than comparable Snapdragon chips however usually much less highly effective. The agency routinely launches Exynos variants of telephones in some markets (e.g. EMEA) however doesn’t provide the Snapdragon model in these territories, depriving these prospects of one of the best efficiency. What’s significantly troubling in regards to the Exynos chips is that they’re virtually at all times made by Samsung Foundry, regardless of TSMC’s repute for superior manufacturing prowess. This determination to present Samsung Foundry some work virtually definitely leads to inferior efficiency and battery life at instances.
How for much longer can Samsung keep complacent, although?

Ryan Haines / Android Authority
There are evidently many potential the explanation why Samsung doesn’t provide large upgrades fairly often on its high-end smartphones. This doesn’t appear to be hurting the corporate, although, because the Galaxy S24 and S25 telephones each delivered improbable gross sales. So there’s clearly extra to constructing a telephone that folks need than a spec sheet alone.
However, Samsung is clearly coasting proper now with its Galaxy S telephones. Over 55% of our polled readers thought the corporate was enjoying it too secure, whereas simply ~13% mentioned it was nonetheless churning out nice flagship telephones. So whereas normal customers is likely to be shopping for these telephones in droves, it is likely to be a matter of time till they sensible as much as the shortage of upgrades. This complacency definitely opens the door for one more main Android model to steal a few of the agency’s market share, however who will or not it’s?
Thanks for being a part of our group. Learn our Remark Coverage earlier than posting.


